Support
Answer and teaching response
1488 · The ones row is 248 and the tens row is 1,240, so 1,240 + 248 = 1,488. The written 1 in 12 represents ten groups.
Audit a whole-number multiplication algorithm by naming each partial product, repairing its place value and checking the result against a useful bound.
Get student and teacher materialsLearning goal: Produce a corrected two-row multiplication with a written explanation of the tens row and an independent reasonableness check.
You will need: Paper, pencil and squared paper if available. Prepare columns headed thousands, hundreds, tens and ones. Label quantities and do the initial calculations without a calculator; all pack counts are invented.
Calculate 46 × 20. Enter the product and explain what the digit 2 means in the multiplier 20.
920 · The 2 means two tens, or twenty groups: 46 × 2 = 92, then 92 × 10 = 920. Forty-six times two would count only two groups.
Start with support: If the learner gives 92 or cannot name twenty groups, write 20 = 2 × 10 and combine two groups of 46 tens. Use 14 × 20 = 280 as a recheck before beginning the support product.
Ready for core: If the learner gives 920 and explains the tens, ask them to label both partial products in the faulty worked example before doing any addition.
There are 32 packs with 246 labels in every pack. A draft shows 246 × 2 = 492, 246 × 3 = 738, then adds 492 + 738 = 1,230 as the answer to 246 × 32. What is the correct total, and where did the draft lose place value?
The correct total is 7,872 labels. The first row counts two packs. The digit 3 in 32 represents thirty packs, so the second partial product must be 246 × 30 = 7,380. Add 492 + 7,380 = 7,872.
A learner might say: The second digit is 3, so its row is simply 246 × 3 = 738 in the same columns as the first row.
Cover the ones digit of 32 and ask how many packs the remaining 3 represents. Write 30 beside the row. Connect shifting the row to multiplying by thirty, and ask what quantity each column records instead of treating a written zero as a rule to memorise.
Use the diagnostic to choose support or core practice, then try the challenge. Complete the independent check without help. Enter a number, fraction or mixed number. The number check does not assess your drawing or explanation.
1488 · The ones row is 248 and the tens row is 1,240, so 1,240 + 248 = 1,488. The written 1 in 12 represents ten groups.
7368 · 307 × 4 = 1,228 and 307 × 20 = 6,140. The total is 7,368. The tens multiplier is twenty even though 307 has zero tens within it.
243 · The ones row is correct. The tens row should be 12,270 because 409 × 3 = 1,227 and ten times that is 12,270. The correct total is 14,724, which is 243 above 14,481.
9374 · The rows are 218 × 3 = 654 and 218 × 40 = 8,720, giving 9,374. A total for 43 groups must exceed 8,720, so 1,526 is too small.
A different draft for 246 × 32 has the correct rows 492 and 7,380 but gives their sum as 7,772. What should be repaired, and why would shifting a row again make matters worse?
Repair the addition: 492 + 7,380 = 7,872, a change of 100. Both partial products already have the correct place value. In the tens column, 9 tens + 8 tens = 17 tens, so 1 hundred must be carried. Shifting a correct row would change the number of packs it represents.
Support: Keep the multiplier expanded as 10 + 2 while completing 124 × 12. Put a label above each row before using the compact algorithm. Use a place-value grid to make the empty ones column in the tens row visible.
Extend: Audit 246 × 302 using 300 + 0 + 2. The partial products are 73,800, 0 and 492, giving 74,292. Explain why omitting a zero-valued row is acceptable only when the remaining rows keep their correct place values.
Student pages and teacher answers are separate. Keep the HTML files or print them in your browser.
Use Repeated Fraction Groups when the prerequisite gap is understanding multiplication as a number of equal groups. Its examples use fractions; this investigation's 46 × 20 diagnostic and place-value columns supply the separate whole-number tens work needed for the algorithm.