Use a size bound before computation and reject exact answers that violate it.
The original lesson PDFs remain version 1.0.0. This supplement adds diagnostic probes, teaching responses, and question-specific rubrics. Use the supplement below for the updated guidance.
Ask for an explanation or drawing before choosing a response. A wrong answer alone does not identify its cause.
Question-by-question misconception guide and open-response criteria
Use these as follow-up prompts, then examine the learner’s model or explanation. Open responses may differ from the sample while satisfying the criteria.
c1: Calculate 1/3 + 1/4. Show a model or your reasoning.
Watch for: Combines numerator counts before making the fractional units alike.
Try: Overlay thirds and fourths on the same whole to make twelfths. Rename 1/3 as 4/12 and 1/4 as 3/12; combine seven twelfths. Ask which original amount would change if only its denominator were replaced.
c2: Calculate 5/6 + 7/8. Show a model or your reasoning.
Watch for: Combines numerator counts before making the fractional units alike.
Try: Overlay thirds and fourths on the same whole to make twelfths. Rename 1/3 as 4/12 and 1/4 as 3/12; combine seven twelfths. Ask which original amount would change if only its denominator were replaced.
c3: Calculate 2/5 + 3/8. Show a model or your reasoning.
Watch for: Combines numerator counts before making the fractional units alike.
Try: Overlay thirds and fourths on the same whole to make twelfths. Rename 1/3 as 4/12 and 1/4 as 3/12; combine seven twelfths. Ask which original amount would change if only its denominator were replaced.
c4: Calculate 3/4 + 2/3. Show a model or your reasoning.
Watch for: Combines numerator counts before making the fractional units alike.
Try: Overlay thirds and fourths on the same whole to make twelfths. Rename 1/3 as 4/12 and 1/4 as 3/12; combine seven twelfths. Ask which original amount would change if only its denominator were replaced.
c5: Calculate 7/8 - 1/3. Show a model or your reasoning.
Watch for: Subtracts unlike numerator or denominator counts without preserving equivalent values.
Try: Show 5/6 as 10/12 and 1/4 as 3/12 on a shared unit. Remove three of the ten twelfths. Check 7/12 + 3/12 = 10/12 before returning to the original fractions.
c6: Calculate 5/6 - 1/2. Show a model or your reasoning.
Watch for: Subtracts unlike numerator or denominator counts without preserving equivalent values.
Try: Show 5/6 as 10/12 and 1/4 as 3/12 on a shared unit. Remove three of the ten twelfths. Check 7/12 + 3/12 = 10/12 before returning to the original fractions.
c7: Calculate 9/10 - 2/5. Show a model or your reasoning.
Watch for: Subtracts unlike numerator or denominator counts without preserving equivalent values.
Try: Show 5/6 as 10/12 and 1/4 as 3/12 on a shared unit. Remove three of the ten twelfths. Check 7/12 + 3/12 = 10/12 before returning to the original fractions.
c8: Calculate 4/5 - 3/8. Show a model or your reasoning.
Watch for: Subtracts unlike numerator or denominator counts without preserving equivalent values.
Try: Show 5/6 as 10/12 and 1/4 as 3/12 on a shared unit. Remove three of the ten twelfths. Check 7/12 + 3/12 = 10/12 before returning to the original fractions.
s1: Calculate 1/2 + 1/4. Show a model or your reasoning.
Watch for: Combines numerator counts before making the fractional units alike.
Try: Overlay thirds and fourths on the same whole to make twelfths. Rename 1/3 as 4/12 and 1/4 as 3/12; combine seven twelfths. Ask which original amount would change if only its denominator were replaced.
s2: Calculate 1/3 + 1/3. Show a model or your reasoning.
Watch for: Adds, subtracts, or multiplies a denominator when combining counts of the same fractional unit.
Try: Place three eighth-size pieces beside five eighth-size pieces. Count eight pieces without recutting any of them. Write 8/8 and explain why 8/16 would describe smaller pieces than the ones on the table.
s3: Calculate 3/4 - 1/4. Show a model or your reasoning.
Watch for: Adds, subtracts, or multiplies a denominator when combining counts of the same fractional unit.
Try: Place three eighth-size pieces beside five eighth-size pieces. Count eight pieces without recutting any of them. Write 8/8 and explain why 8/16 would describe smaller pieces than the ones on the table.
s4: Calculate 2/3 - 1/3. Show a model or your reasoning.
Watch for: Adds, subtracts, or multiplies a denominator when combining counts of the same fractional unit.
Try: Place three eighth-size pieces beside five eighth-size pieces. Count eight pieces without recutting any of them. Write 8/8 and explain why 8/16 would describe smaller pieces than the ones on the table.
h1: Why is 2/7 unreasonable for 1/3 + 1/4?
Watch for: Accepts an exact answer that contradicts the size or direction of the operation.
Try: Before calculating, mark the starting amount and predict the direction of change. A positive sum must exceed either addend; a positive subtraction result is below the starting amount. Use 0, 1/2, 1, or 2 to bound the result, then compare the exact answer with that bound.
Look for in the response:
- State that adding a positive 1/4 must make the result exceed 1/3.
- Show 2/7 < 1/3, using 6/21 < 7/21 or another valid comparison.
- Reject 2/7 on this size contradiction without relying only on a memorized addition rule.
h2: Estimate 5/6 + 7/8 using whole benchmarks.
Watch for: Accepts an exact answer that contradicts the size or direction of the operation.
Try: Before calculating, mark the starting amount and predict the direction of change. A positive sum must exceed either addend; a positive subtraction result is below the starting amount. Use 0, 1/2, 1, or 2 to bound the result, then compare the exact answer with that bound.
Look for in the response:
- Identify both 5/6 and 7/8 as close to but below one.
- Predict a sum close to but below two.
- Explain why two is an upper benchmark rather than the exact sum.
h3: Estimate 7/8 - 1/3 using half as a benchmark.
Watch for: Accepts an exact answer that contradicts the size or direction of the operation.
Try: Before calculating, mark the starting amount and predict the direction of change. A positive sum must exceed either addend; a positive subtraction result is below the starting amount. Use 0, 1/2, 1, or 2 to bound the result, then compare the exact answer with that bound.
Look for in the response:
- Use one half as the target benchmark for the difference.
- Give a reason the difference is near or slightly above one half.
- Check consistency with 13/24, or use 7/8 − 1/2 = 3/8 > 1/3 to prove it is above half.
h4: Create an incorrect answer that estimation can reject immediately.
Watch for: Accepts an exact answer that contradicts the size or direction of the operation.
Try: Before calculating, mark the starting amount and predict the direction of change. A positive sum must exceed either addend; a positive subtraction result is below the starting amount. Use 0, 1/2, 1, or 2 to bound the result, then compare the exact answer with that bound.
Look for in the response:
- Invent an actual incorrect fraction-operation result.
- State a size bound or direction that a correct answer must satisfy.
- Demonstrate the proposed answer violates that bound, such as a positive sum below an addend.
e1: Calculate 1/3 + 1/4. Show a model or your reasoning.
Watch for: Combines numerator counts before making the fractional units alike.
Try: Overlay thirds and fourths on the same whole to make twelfths. Rename 1/3 as 4/12 and 1/4 as 3/12; combine seven twelfths. Ask which original amount would change if only its denominator were replaced.
e2: Give one reason to reject a positive sum smaller than an addend.
Watch for: Accepts an exact answer that contradicts the size or direction of the operation.
Try: Before calculating, mark the starting amount and predict the direction of change. A positive sum must exceed either addend; a positive subtraction result is below the starting amount. Use 0, 1/2, 1, or 2 to bound the result, then compare the exact answer with that bound.
Look for in the response:
- Specify that the added amount is positive.
- Explain that adding it moves above the starting value.
- Use this to reject a proposed sum below either positive addend, including the e1 quantities.