Before: Review pre1 and pre2. Separate an arithmetic slip from counting the starting term as an addition. Prepare position cards and one fewer arrow than positions for learners who need that distinction. Use the existing opening diagnostic to check the proposed support route.
Focus: Run the existing start-at-3, add-6 investigation. Label the start as term 1, generate the table and explain why term 8 uses seven additions. Use paired counters to justify parity from both the start and increment. Discuss why a short list without a supplied rule does not determine a unique continuation. Keep the existing support/core/challenge phase, assigning work according to the observed difficulty.
Collect: Collect post1 and post2 during the final ten minutes. Inspect the position-to-change records as well as 19 and 56. For post2, look for an even start plus an even increment preserving evenness, rather than a claim based only on displayed terms. Record the numerical result and explanation separately.
If secure: Proceed to the coordinate lesson when the learner can use a supplied rule, count one fewer change than term position and explain a property from the start and increment. Ask them to keep the words 'position' and 'value' visible in their table as they encounter another kind of position next.
If more support is needed: Use the explicit-rule routing recheck after a brief position-card or pairing model. If the fresh response still counts one addition too many, retain the cards and schedule further rule work; coordinate work can still begin with small whole-number movements, while the pattern gap stays recorded for the final lesson.
Before: Review pre3 and pre4 for a reversed pair, movement from the wrong starting point or a changing fixed coordinate. Prepare first-quadrant axes with origin (0, 0), x increasing right, y increasing up and one-unit intervals. Say explicitly that a term's position in a list and a point's position on a grid are different uses of the word position.
Focus: Run the existing A (1, 2) to B (5, 2) to C (5, 6) to D (2, 6) route. Repair the helper's reversed B, explain which coordinate changes on each leg and distinguish location from distance traveled. Keep the original worked example and differentiated practice; use the exact pair data to check a sketch rather than estimating from its appearance.
Collect: Collect post3 and post4 in place of the original exit and transfer items. Look for (6, 2) and the repaired endpoint (8, 4), with an explanation that x is horizontal and y is vertical. The requested numerical entries are 6 and 4; neither entry alone establishes correct ordered-pair notation or plotting.
If secure: Proceed to paired patterns when the learner plots and reads ordered pairs with a stable axis order and can explain why a horizontal move changes only x and a vertical move changes only y. Introduce Pattern A as the future horizontal coordinate and Pattern B as the future vertical coordinate.
If more support is needed: Use the coordinate-position routing recheck after tracing one horizontal and one vertical movement. Keep x and y labels visible and reduce the number of stops. Before paired-pattern graphing, confirm the learner can repair the new endpoint and explain the coordinate order; meanwhile, they can generate paired terms in an aligned table.
Before: Review pre5 and pre6 alongside the earlier rule and coordinate evidence. Prepare a row for each common stage and clearly separate 'term 1' from 'zero additions': both name the starting stage in this sequence. Use the existing lesson's stated zero starts and +2/+4 rules before changing any starts or increments.
Focus: Run the existing two-pattern investigation, generating both supplied rules at the same stage and writing each pair in the order (A, B). Plot A horizontally and B vertically using the stated scale. Explain doubling from the zero starts and the relationship between increments, then use the original changed-start challenge to test a claim that different increments alone determine the relationship.
Collect: Collect post5 and post6 during the final ten minutes. Inspect the ordered-pair tables, labeled graphs and starting-value arguments in addition to 32 and 12. A graph made from mismatched stages or an unexplained 'three times' claim needs follow-up even when its entered number is correct.
If secure: Use the unit transfer after the sequence to combine term-position counting, ordered-pair orientation and a relationship with an offset. Treat the result as evidence for selecting the next task, alongside the written work from each skill; do not convert it into a general mastery claim.
If more support is needed: Choose the paired-patterns routing recheck for stage alignment or an unsupported multiplier claim. Return to the earlier skill route when the difficulty is an off-by-one change count or reversed coordinates. Reassess with a fresh independent response after the targeted model, keeping the original response in the record.